Barry Eisler has two different claims to fame. To readers, he is the best-selling author of two exciting thriller series: the guy who doesn’t just write about heroes who are ex CIA covert ops specialists, Judo experts, international players, and start-up lawyer/operators but actually IS all those things himself. Or was at some point before coming in out of the cold to do boring things like collect awards for his work.
To indie authors, he’s a hero of another kind: one of the handful of writers like Konrath and Doctorow and Hocking and Locke who have become icons, living totems that not only testify to seismic changes in publishing, but have had a major hand in making those changes happen.
It would be hard to identify a single action that did more to light up new potential and realities for independent writers and publishers than Eisler’s decision last March to snub a half-million dollar advance from St. Martins in order to go his own way. The answer to the sneering, “Yeah, but if they offered you a big advance, you’d take it, wouldn’t you?” officially changed from “Damn straight” to “Maybe”, and that small shift put a very major crack in the monolith.
But as revolutionary icons go, Eisler is different from the others mentioned above. Without denigrating their work, the difference is that Eisler is more important to more people as a writer than as a marching banner. He has more fans than disciples or legions. I’m not going to go into detail about his work because it’s easy enough to get information on his series about half-Japanese assassin John Rain or black ops soldier Ben Treven, and highly recommended. While at his websiteย it’s also well worth exploring his blogs of iconoclastic insights into language, writing, and that peculiar form of black ops we refer to as “politics”.
He graciously responded to my request for what he considers an essential writing tip with this:
If there’s one thing all writers should do to improve their mastery of craft (besides writing itself), it’s this: read like a writer. Let me explain what I mean.
Sometimes I hear people say, “You can’t teach writing — after, all, you can’t teach art.” This is foolishness and I find it irritating. Of course you can’t teach art, but teaching art isn’t the point. Art can’t be expressed without craft — so the point is to teach craft, and craft absolutely can be taught and learned.
So if there’s a book like the one you’re trying to write, something you love, one of your favorites — read it again. Read it first as a reader, for pure enjoyment. And then read it another time, this time asking yourself what is it the author is doing that makes the book so good. You can do this kind of analysis for anything — the entire story arc, a description of setting, a love scene, an action scene, dialogue, whatever. Don’t ask what is it about you that makes you like the book — that will teach you something about yourself, but not about craft.
Ask yourself what techniques the writer is employing that make the scene or story or whatever so effective. Look for those techniques and you’ll find them, and the more conscious you become of them in the writing of others, the better you’re able to articulate what those techniques are, the better you’ll be able to deploy them yourself.
As an example of this exercise, have a look at the opening paragraphs of Ken Follett’s The Key to Rebecca. Ask yourself how Follett is introducing who (character), what (plot), and where (setting). Ask what he’s holding back. Ask how he’s building suspense and engaging your interest — how he makes you want to read more. At every level, ask what makes these opening paragraphs such a superb start to the story.
That’s just one example, of course. Again, you can — and should — do this kind of analysis for whatever kind of story, sequence, plot, setting, character, dialogue you’re trying to write.
The greater the mastery of craft, which can and should be taught and learned, the better you can express yourself as an artist. Your art is a function of whatever is unique about you. If you hadn’t been born, your art could never have happened. But if you don’t learn craft, it’ll never happen, either. So your job is to learn your craft and then to use it to express your art. Good luck!
Thank you Barry and Lin – that’s very sound advice!
Excellent stuff indeed.
Such a wonderful way of looking at writing. Thank you for the advice and inspiration!
Great stuff – again. Thanks
Fabulous advice. Now if you could only train me to be able to read like a reader again. Since I decided to take my writing seriously, I haven’t been able to turn off the writer when I read. ๐
Nice post Lin with some great advice.
I haven’t done that with every novel I’ve read, but I have done so with several. One English major (when he discovered what I was doing) said that he was taught to do that in his one class. It is a valid way of seeing the techniques employed.
This advice is solid gold. Thanks, Lin and Barry.
What great advice! It is nice to know that someone else thinks in a like minded fashion. Best of luck to you both!
All the Best,
Rionna Morgan.
This is an excellent, clarification of the art versus the craft of writing. Well done!
Great post! Excellent advice! Advice that even seasoned writers can use. Thanks!!
Really good advice for screenwriters too. An aid to learning the craft.
Thanks for the feedback, everyone, and glad it was helpful!
Thanks to You, Barry.
You don’t often see such unanimous approval around here. ๐
Great post, Lin!
Barry, thanks for the great advice!
Another fantastic author suggests modeling and analysis. Thanks, Barry. I harken back to the advice of the late great novelist and writing instructor Jack Bickham who suggested that all writers should take their favorite novel (you choose) and use markers to notate all of Barry’s suggestions and more. Sights, smells, sentence length, structure, format, anything that strikes you as important. Now reflect those same features in your own writing. By modeling successful craft, he taught, we are well on our way to writing our own favorite novel.
I’ve got my markers. Now where is my copy of “The Detachment?”
Great advice. I must admit I read mainly for enjoyment and don’t take the time to figure out why the books I like click.
Morgan Mandel
http://morgansbooklinks.blogspot.com
I think this would be a great idea for writers. Once you start writing, you often find your own pathway, and after a time, your own style. I hope I never get to the point where I internally dissect a book I’m reading as it’s something you should enjoy.
http://madisonjohns.com
I think it’s kind of inevitable for writers. Like any professional, you evaluate your peers and betters, seeing them with a different eye.
What Barry is laying out here is more focused on it.
The sharp contrast, to me, is between starting with successful work you admire, and trying to break it down, and the usual “writing class” approach where they are trying to lay out exercises and techniques and terminology a priori.
As an example, I see absoultely no reason a writer actually needs to know all those “third person close”, “first person indivisible” things. But seeing what a point of view works like and can do is very helpful.