Yes, Fiction Writers Do Research

‘Write what you know.’ We have all heard that statement in one context or another, but what does it mean? This is actually a beast that raises its head periodically, in many different guises, at Indies Unlimited. The ‘Get it right’ posts are just one guise; I think all of the staff and several guests have done at least one piece on the subject. ‘Get the fight right!’ was my contribution (write what you know, right?). However, it all comes down to the same thing; you have to know what you are writing about or risk being labelled unprofessional. Do The Research.

I was being interviewed on an ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) radio program last year and one of the questions put to me was, “So, being an historical fiction based on fact, I suppose you would have had to do some research for ‘Terra Nullius’; as apposed to, say, your usual genres of memoir or pure fiction?” The assumption being that the ‘memoirs’ came straight out of my memory, and the ‘fiction’ came straight out of my imagination.

“Research plays a major part in the writing of any book,” I said. “Even fantasy requires the writer to get some general facts and rules straight; they may actually conduct considerable research on certain aspects, giving their story credibility. Some in-depth, researched facts can do wonders to suspend a reader’s disbelief, regardless of genre.”

Research takes many forms and, although ‘observational research’ is probably the primary method of research for writers of fiction, writing a novel requires multiple phases of research, reflection and exploration to transform an original vision into a completed manuscript. All writers are natural observers, and so their research is a never ending undertaking. Writers of fiction have extra-active imaginations, and so they allow storylines and characters et cetera to flow from a rich imagination that is banked up by a lifetime of observation (a virtual plethora of research).

A friend of mine is a children’s writer, who has successfully written a trilogy with the main protagonist being a teenage girl who is half Australian aboriginal and half Scottish. Many years of being a teacher and school principal (having spent a great deal of that time with aboriginal children in the far north of Australia) have given him an insight into young minds from a variety of cultures; and originating from Scotland himself, he portrays a fine example of utilising considerable, observed research and personal history.

Locational research can be a major boon for all types of fiction; whether that be in the form of detailed surroundings for specific scenes in realistic fiction or, in the case of fantasy and sci-fi writers, to help fire imagination, providing relatable details for otherworldly settings.

Internet research has become indispensable; who among us does not use the Net? Not many I’ll warrant. In fact, I’d wager that part of the reason we currently have a glut of writers, quite apart from the ease of ePublishing, is the ease of research via the Internet. And don’t get me wrong, I love having a wide range of information, quite literally, at my fingertips. However, let us not forget that most of that information is uploaded by parties who give no guarantees that it is rock-solid fact. For instance, I use Wikipedia but I have also corrected some quite glaring mistakes on that same Wikipedia. Libraries are less used these days, and the hard copies within them are used even less: have you noticed how the banks of computers in the libraries are always fully occupied?

Oral research is a method not often used by authors of fiction, and yet interviewing people in regard to certain jobs or vocations (like piloting a jet or performing surgery), or experiences that are impractical to actually, physically experience yourself (like drowning) is quite logical. If you can’t actually experience something yourself, the best way to understand what it feels like – enough to make it appear real on the page – is to talk to someone or, better still, several people, who have experienced it.

Whether you are writing fiction or not, researching checkable facts is extremely important. My first two books were memoirs, constructs around memories, but those memories had to be backed up by research in regard to timelines and other checkable facts. Told in the first person, the characters were portrayed the way they appeared to me at the time of the remembered experiences; however, there was considerable memory searching, internal research, to establish, among other things, what limiting beliefs I viewed reality through, as that child, which helped to form the impressions of those characters.

My three subsequent books were researched and written differently, not only from the memoirs but also from each other. The characters that populate my fiction just seem to appear and tell me their stories; however I suspect they are personalities I have encountered, if not in this reality then another, or perhaps they are aspects of my own nature? The truth is probably a combination of all of the above, together with what the life experience has taught me about people and what they are capable of doing. For writers of fiction there is a large, limitless bank of research material available, in this and many other realities, should you chose to explore.

My action/crime/thriller combines of a lot of my life experiences, skills and personal knowledge; the research entailed with that book involved filling in the shortfalls in my knowledge and or experience: making sure the details, timelines and checkable facts were accurate.

The characters were all too familiar ghosts that I breathed life into: textual research. Textual research is a process of empathy to imagine the inner lives of characters.

My speculative fiction story contains portions of some deeply held personal philosophies; entailing the examination of the very nature of my own beliefs (more internal research). The characters came to me through my psyche, as I’ve said in whatever way that happens (more textual research).

The story moves around the planet and so, backing up my own geographical experience and knowledge, a certain amount of research was needed there; however, the real challenging research (and I loved it) was in regard to Antarctica: in the event of a polar melt, towards the later part of the 21st century, what would be the likely political implications? What would the topography be like? What would be the probable locations for population centres?

My historical fiction research encompassed all of the methodologies mentioned in this post and, had the interviewer said, “I’m supposing you would do more research?” I would have simply answered, “Yes.”

The research for my historical fiction was long and arduous. It was however extremely rewarding. What began with an oral rendition of a little known episode in Tasmanian history: a chapter, inexplicably, not common knowledge even in Tasmania, let alone Australia and the world at large, took me two solid years to research and complete.

In terms of research, all books are not equal; however all writers, at least those who want to be taken seriously, need to do the research necessary for each, particular project. Not only do they owe it to themselves and their readers, should they not, they run the risk of a scathing review from a discerning reader with specialised knowledge. That alone is motivation enough for me to do the research.

How much research do you do?

Author: T.D. McKinnon

Scottish author T.D.McKinnon ‘Survived the Battleground of Childhood’ in the coal mining communities of Scotland and England before joining the British Parachute Regiment at fifteen where he remained for five years. He has trained in the martial arts for most of his life and had five Karate schools in Scotland before immigrating to Australia. He writes across several genres and has completed five books that are all available as eBooks. He lives in Tasmania, Australia with his wife. Learn more about T.D.McKinnon at his website and Amazon author page.

23 thoughts on “Yes, Fiction Writers Do Research”

  1. I loved this post TD. I write science fiction and during the last ten years I’ve become fairly knowledgeable about genetics, viruses, astronomy, psychopaths and all sorts of weird and wonderful earth creatures that anchor my imagination in a version of reality. For example, did you know there are worms which are hermaphrodites and ‘duel’ with their um, male genitalia? The one that wins does the deed and leaves the loser to play mummy. I swear, I’m not making that up. 😀

    1. That’s one little known fact that I certainly wasn’t aware of… Oh no… I just had a vision flash across the canvas of my imagination: as a sci fi writer you must have read Dune… I think I’m going to have nightmares tonight!

      Thanks for dropping by, AC.

  2. LOL! True life is often stranger than fiction… which just makes us write more!

  3. Great post, TD. I do a lot of research, but only after the first draft. I fear getting caught up in it, distracted by shiny things, and just let my subconscious supply the first round of details. Then I fill in with a combination of all the methods you’ve described. One novel [not yet published] is set in Syracuse, NY, where I lived for a short time. The area around the university has a particular smell and feel. After the first draft, I spent a few days up there, re-remembering, hanging out where my characters hang out, walking their streets. Turns out my memory had romanticized a few things, and, of course, anyone who knew the area would have scoffed at my current draft. So…research? Definitely important.

  4. “Oral research is a method not often used by authors of fiction,”

    This is one of my favorite forms of research, maybe because I just love listening to people talk about their lives and what makes them tick. It can be particularly nerve wracking however, depending on who you are talking to – I’ve now spoken with several local detectives for my mystery novels and still find it strange to discuss fictional crimes with real detectives – sometimes I wonder whether I’m going to end up on their ‘watch out for this one list’ – and I don’t mean in the author sense!

    Also a fabulous source of real-life info for crime/mystery writers is the Writers Police Academy, an annual conference for writers held in North Carolina, which is basically three days of workshops, demonstrations and role-playing at a real police academy where all the instructors are current/retires law enforcement, forensic experts and emergency workers. I went for the first time last year and learned so much about how they work in real life as opposed to what we see on tv/movies or read in many novels. ( It’s alsoo amazing fun and I am going back this year, as I didn’t have time to attend all the sessions I wanted to last year as there are just so many options. (For any one interested, I have to say that it is already sold out for September so you would have to go on the wait list.)

      1. That ‘Writers Police Academy’ sounds excellent; nothing like that anywhere on this side of the planet. I have a large bank of knowledge and experience but procedures change with the times and, as Laurie indicated, memory tends to colour things (sometimes rosy and sometimes grey). New, fresh and different perspectives (research) are needed if, as authors, we are to deliver the goods.

  5. One of my favorite things about writing is research! LOVE love love it. Especially the experiential.

    Great post, TD! Thanks 🙂

  6. You are quite right, TD.
    We may make up the story, but any fiction writer worth his salt will check out the little details. An easy was to lose a reader is to miss a detail. This was pointed out to me at a book club I visited where one of the women said, “If Katherine was traveling to Montauk she wouldn’t fly into Newark Airport.” You can bet I fixed that in the new edition.
    Wonderful post. 🙂

    1. All it takes is one, relatively (when you think of all the work and research that you do put in), small detail that most people would never pick, and which just one person with specific experience or expertise notices, to make you feel like a hack (I’m talking from personal experience here).

      Thanks for dropping by and sharing, Lois.

    1. I have no doubt that there is a vast amount of research concerned with the ‘Pipe Woman Chronicles’, and it shows.

      Thanks for dropping by, Lynne.

  7. Research adds believability to historical fiction. For my twin novels set in 1838–Counter Currents and Islands of Love and War–I used the same data about the 1838 Patriot War I used in my non-fiction history book. But I went further. I kayaked through the Thousand Islands in the St. Lawrence and visited the older parts of towns where scenes were set to get a feel for them. I even checked 1838 moon charts; so if I said there was a full moon out in the story, it was in fact so. (Maybe that wasn’t necessary.)

    There is serendipity in research–you find stuff to add to the story you’d not thought of.

    Great post. Thanks

    1. No Shaun, I don’t think it was over the top to check out full moons et cetera, commendable in fact. In my action/thriller fiction, ‘John Farrell Is Utrinque Paratus’, there was a certain catastrophic incident and I wanted it to happen on a ‘Friday the 13th’ (set in 1995), and you can bet that was right on the money. Research has many rewards.

      Thanks for dropping by, Shaun, and viva the detail.

  8. I write romantic thriller/mysteries that involve art, literature, history, antiques, and music – among a multitude of other inclusions – and the bulk of my work is of course research. One must get the vision right for readers who very often look things up as they enjoy the story. The swirl of reader research stimulated by Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, for example, was amazing, and I often receive messages from readers who say they read two or three companion ‘fact’ volumes to the novels I write. These days, writing a well-researched novel (in any genre) is tantamount to doing a degree. One emerges infinitely better informed than before, and yes – capable of answering a swathe of questions put by any intrepid interviewer.

  9. Exactly so, Rosanne. And the funny thing is when I start out on a project I never even consider the amount of research I will be doing and it is the research that takes, by far, the most time. Don’t you just love being a writer!

    Thank you so much for dropping by, Rosanne.

Comments are closed.